Fields v. State

991 S.W.2d 213, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 687
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 18, 1999·No. No. 75274·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. He was convicted after a jury trial of forcible rape, section 566.030, RSMo 1994, resisting arrest, section 575.150, RSMo 1994, and assault in the third degree, section 565.070, RSMo 1994. Movant was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender to consecutive terms of life imprisonment for forcible rape, ten years for resisting arrest and one year for assault in the third degree.

The motion court’s findings are not clearly erroneous, and no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fields v. State, 991 S.W.2d 213, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 687 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999).

991 S.W.2d 213 (Fields v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State of Missouri v. Ardell Fields
517 S.W.3d 549 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2016)
Ardell Fields v. State of Missouri
Missouri Court of Appeals, 2014
Fields v. State
425 S.W.3d 215 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2014)