Fields v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Fields v. State

666 So. 2d 554, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 11987, 1995 WL 676060

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 15, 1995·No. No. 95-485·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After a careful review of the record, we find that the trial court did not abuse its broad discretion regarding the admissibility of evidence. Jent v. State, 408 So.2d 1024, 1029 (Fla.1981), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1111, 102 S.Ct. 2916, 73 L.Ed.2d 1322 (1982). Additionally, if there was any error in the admission of this evidence, that error was harmless in light of the solid eyewitness identification of the defendant. State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

After a careful review of the record, we find that the trial court did not abuse its broad discretion regarding the admissibility of evidence. Jent v. State, 408 So.2d 1024, 1029 (Fla.1981), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1111, 102 S.Ct. 2916, 73 L.Ed.2d 1322 (1982). Additionally, if there was any error in the admission of this evidence, that error was harmless in light of the solid eyewitness identification of the defendant. State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986).

Affirmed.

Fields v. State, 666 So. 2d 554, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 11987, 1995 WL 676060 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

666 So. 2d 554 (Fields v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related