Fields v. State

172 So. 357, 127 Fla. 17
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 1, 1937·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Writ of error is to judgment of conviction .of murder in the first degree without recommendation to mercy.

*18 The only question presented challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to establish the element of premeditated design.

Under the rule stated in the case of Lowe v. The State of Florida, 90 Fla. 255, 105 Sou. 829, and cases there cited, there was ample evidence to warrant the jury in reaching the verdict upon which the judgment is based.

The judgment should be affirmed.

It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Ellis, C. J., Whitfield, Terrell, Brown, Buford, and Davis, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fields v. State, 172 So. 357, 127 Fla. 17 (Fla. 1937).

172 So. 357 (Fields v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lowe v. State
105 So. 829 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1925)