Fields v. Mobetize Corp.

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided May 24, 2017·No. 73093·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

CARY FIELDS, No. 73093 Appellant, vs. Fi MOBETIZE CORP., A NEVADA MAY 2 4 2017 CORPORATION; AJAY HANS; MALEK ELIZABETH A. riROWN LADKI; AND DONALD DUBERSTEIN, CLERK OF SUPREME COURT Respondents. BY 5.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is purportedly an appeal from a district court order that, in part, denied appellant's motion for preliminary injunction. However, it appears the district court has not yet entered a written order resolving appellant's motion for preliminary injunction. A district court's minute order is ineffective for any purpose and cannot be appealed, and a written order or judgment must be filed before a district court ruling can be appealed. See Rust v. Clark Cnty. School District, 103 Nev. 686, 747 P.2d 1380 (1987). Accordingly, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction over this appeal, and we ORDER this appealjaLaMISSED. 1

Douglas

Gibboirs Pickering

1-We grant appellant's motion to file a motion for injunction that exceeds the page limit and direct the clerk to file the "emergency" motion received on May 23, 2017. In light of this order, we deny the motion for injunction as moot.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A 17-17357- cc: Hon. Kathleen E. Delaney, District Judge Ballard Spahr, LLP Kolesar & Leatham, Chtd. Eighth District Court Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fields v. Mobetize Corp., (Neb. 2017).

Fields v. Mobetize Corp. (Fields v. Mobetize Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rust v. Clark County School District
747 P.2d 1380 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1987)