Fields v. Marchman
This text of 176 S.E. 635 (Fields v. Marchman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This was a suit by a wife to cancel a deed alleged to have been made by her husband to his sister to defeat a judgment in favor of the plaintiff for temporary alimony and attorney’s fees. In view of the relationship between the grantor and grantee, and other circumstances which might be considered as badges of fraud, the bona fides of the transaction was a question for the jury, and it was error to grant a nonsuit. Coulter v. Lumpkin, 100 Ga. 784 (2) (28 S. E. 459); Hilburn v. Hightower, 178 Ga. 534 (4) (173 S. E. 389); Greene v. Matthews, 31 Ga. App. 265 (120 S. E. 434).
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
176 S.E. 635, 179 Ga. 613, 1934 Ga. LEXIS 342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fields-v-marchman-ga-1934.