Fields v. Kelley
This text of Fields v. Kelley (Fields v. Kelley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States District Court NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION KINNEY LEE FIELDS § v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:23-CV-1565-S-BN KEVIN KELLEY ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case. Objections were filed. The District Court reviewed de novo those portions of the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation to which objection was made, and reviewed the remaining proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding no error, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court dismiss this case with prejudice “unless, within the time to file objections, Plaintiff Kinney Lee Fields satisfactorily shows a basis to amend the complaint to allege a plausible claim.” Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation [ECF No. 7] 9. In the Objections to Recommendation to Dismiss (“Objections”) [ECF No. 8], Plaintiff requested leave to amend. Objs. 1. Plaintiff subsequently filed an Amended Complaint. See Compl. for Employment Discrimination [ECF No, 9]. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2), courts “should freely give leave [to amend] when justice so requires.” See also, e.g., Brewster v, Dretke, 587 F.3d 764, 767-68 (Sth Cir. 2009) (“Generally, ... a pro se litigant should be offered an opportunity to amend his complaint before it is dismissed.” (citation omitted)); Rodriguez v. United States, 66 F.3d 95, 97 (5th Cir. 1995) (“When the dismissal of a
pro se complaint is appropriate, it should generally be done without prejudice in order to allow the plaintiff an opportunity to file an amended complaint.” (citation omitted)). For the reasons stated above, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff's request for leave to file an amended complaint and deems Plaintiff's Amended Complaint [ECF No. 9] properly filed. SO ORDERED. SIGNED September 26, 2023. Lis DQbb NITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
ry
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Fields v. Kelley, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fields-v-kelley-txnd-2023.