Fields v. Johnson
This text of Fields v. Johnson (Fields v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Mississippi primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION
DARREN FIELDS PETITIONER
V. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:19-CV-551-DPJ-FKB
ANDERSON JOHNSON RESPONDENT
ORDER
This action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2254 is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation [8] of Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball. Petitioner Darren Fields contends he is entitled to parole pursuant to Mississippi Code § 97-3-2 because he has served over 50% of his sentence. Judge Ball recommended granting Respondent’s motion to dismiss [6], noting that because Mississippi’s parole statute is discretionary, there is no constitutional right to parole. R&R [8] at 1 (citing Scales v. Miss. State Parole Bd., 831 F.2d 565, 566 (5th Cir. 1987)); see id. at 1–2 (noting Fields had not alleged a denial of parole because of his race or some other improper motive). Alternatively, Judge Ball noted that even if the petition had advanced a cognizable habeas claim, Fields failed to exhaust his state court remedies as required by 28 U.S.C. §2254(b)(1). Id. at 2. Fields did not file an objection to the R&R, and the time to do so has passed. The Court finds the Report and Recommendation [8] should be adopted as the opinion of the Court; the petition is dismissed with prejudice. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this the 24th day of February, 2020.
s/ Daniel P. Jordan III CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Fields v. Johnson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fields-v-johnson-mssd-2020.