Fields v. Baker & Hostetler LLP
This text of 2024 NY Slip Op 31949(U) (Fields v. Baker & Hostetler LLP) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court, New York County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fields v Baker & Hostetler LLP 2024 NY Slip Op 31949(U) June 4, 2024 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 160978/2019 Judge: Robert R. Reed Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. INDEX NO. 160978/2019 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 76 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/05/2024
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: COMMERCIAL DIVISION PART 43 - - - - - - - - · - - -------------------------X
RICHARD FIELDS, JACKSON LAND AND CATTLE, LLC, INDEX NO. 160978/2019 JLC RANCH DEVELOPMENT, LLC, and JLC RANCH, LLC MOTION DATE 05/06/2024 Plaintiffs, MOTION SEQ. NO. 003 -v- BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP, LAURENCE MARKOWITZ, DECISION+ ORDER ON and RAYMOND SUTTON, MOTION Defendants.
------------------- -------X
HON. ROBERT R. REED:
The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 002) 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68 were read on this motion for ATTORNEY - WITHDRAW
In motion sequence 003, law firm Storch Byrne LLP (Storch Byrne), counsel for
plaintiffs, moves pursuant to CPLR §321 (b) (2) and Rules of Professional Conduct (22
NYCRR 1200.0) rule 1.16, for an order granting leave to withdraw as counsel.
Steven G. Storch, Esq., a member of Storch Byrne, submits an affirmation dated May 6,
2024. Counselor Storch affirms, under penalty of perjury, that Storch Byrne seeks to withdraw as
counsel for plaintiffs, Richard Fields, Jackson Land and Cattle, LLC, JLC Ranch Development,
LLC and JLC Ranch, LLC, because of their "failure to pay fees and expenses in accordance with
the agreement between the [t]irm and [p]laintiffs" (NYSCEF doc. no. 71, para 2). Mr. Storch
further affirms that, as a "small law office," Storch Byrne is "not in a position to advance
expenses in this matter or divert lawyers from other work which generates firm revenue, to this
160978/2019 FIELDS, RICHARD vs. BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP Page 1 of4 Motion No. 003
1 of 4 [* 1] INDEX NO. 160978/2019 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 76 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/05/2024
matter for which [it is] not being paid and which involves substantially voluminous discovery
and will require multiple depositions, throughout the United States" (id. at para 5).
Storch Byrne also requests that this court stay all proceedings in this action for sixty days
to allow plaintiffs time to retain new counsel. The motion is unopposed.
CPLR 321 (b) (2) provides:
"[a]n attorney ofrecord may withdraw or be changed by order of the court in which the action is pending, upon motion on such notice to the client of the withdrawing attorney, to the attorneys of all other parties in the action or, if a party appears without an attorney, to the party, and to any other person, as the court may direct."
If an attorney deems it necessary to end the attorney-client relationship without the
consent of the client, the attorney may move on such notice as may be directed by the court, to
be relieved as counsel.by court order (Farage v Ehrenberg, 124 AD3d 159 [2nd Dept 2014]).
"The decision to grant or deny permission for counsel to withdraw lies within the discretion of
the trial court, and the court's decision should not be overturned absent a showing of an
improvident exercise of discretion" (Applebaum v Einstein, 163 AD3d 905, 907 [2nd Dept
2018]).
Here, Storch Byrne submitted sufficient evidence, by way of attorney affirmation, of
plaintiffs' failure to pay legal fees pursuant to their engagement letters (NYSCEF doc. no. 71,
para 2). A party's failure to pay legal fees is sufficient grounds to grant leave to withdraw (see
Weiss v Spitzer, 46 AD3d 675 [2d Dept 2007] [an attorney may be permitted to withdraw from
employment where a client refuses to pay reasonable legal fees]; see also Holmes v Y.J.A. Realty
Corp., 128 AD2d 482 [1st Dept 1987]). Indeed, "there is no obligation on the part of counsel to
finance the litigation or render gratuitous services" (Holmes at 483).
Accordingly, it is hereby
160978/2019 FIELDS, RICHARD vs. BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP Page 2 of 4 Motion No. 003
2 of 4 [* 2] INDEX NO. 160978/2019 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 76 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/05/2024
ORDERED that the motion seq. no. 003 of Steven G. Storch, Esq. and Storch Byrne LLP
to be relieved as counsel for plaintiffs is granted without opposition upon filing of proof of
compliance with the following conditions; and it is further
ORDERED that, within 10 days from entry, said attorney shall serve a copy of this order
with notice of entry upon the former clients at their last known addresses by certified mail, return
receipt requested, and upon the attorneys for all other parties appearing herein by posting to the
New York State Courts Electronic Filing System; and it is further
ORDERED that, together with the copy of this order with notice of entry served upon the
former clients, moving counsel shall forward a notice directing the former clients to appoint a
substitute attorney within 30 days from the date of the mailing of the notice and the client shall
comply therewith, except that, in the event plaintiff Richard Fields intends instead to represent
himself, he shall notify the Clerk of Part 43 of this decision in writing within said 30-day period;
and it is further
ORDERED that any new attorney retained by the plaintiffs shall file a notice of
appearance with the Clerk of the General Clerk's Office (60 Centre Street, Room 119) and the
Clerk of Part 43 within 40 days from the date the notice to retain new counsel is mailed; and it is
further
ORDERED that no further proceedings may be taken against the former clients without
leave of this court for a period of 30 days after service on the former clients of the aforesaid notice
to appoint a substitute attorney; and it is further
ORDERED that the departing attorney shall, within 10 days from entry, serve a copy of
this order with notice of entry on the Clerk of the General Clerk's Office (Room 119); and it is
160978/2019 FIELDS, RICHARD vs. BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP Page 3 of 4 Motion No. 003
3 of 4 [* 3] INDEX NO. 160978/2019 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 76 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/05/2024
ORDERED that such service upon the Clerk of the General Clerk's Office, the filing of a
notice of appearance as provided herein, and the filing of papers as aforesaid shall be made in
accordance with the procedures set forth in the Protocol on Courthouse and County Clerk
Procedures for Electronically Filed Cases (accessible at the "E-Filing" page on the court's website
at the address www.nycourts.gov/supctmanh)]; and it is further
ORDERED that the parties shall appear for a status conference to be held via Microsoft
TEAMS on August 20, 2024, at 10:30 a.m.
This constitutes the decision and order of this court.
ROBERT R. REED, J.S.C.
CHECK ONE: CASE DISPOSED NON-FINAL DISPOSITION
GRANTED □ DENIED GRANTED IN PART · □ OTHER APPLICATION: SETTLE ORDER SUBMIT ORDER
CHECK IF APPROPRIATE: INCLUDES TRANSFER/REASSIGN FIDUCIARY APPOINTMENT □ REFERENCE
160978/2019 FIELDS, RICHARD vs. BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP Page 4 of 4 Motion No.. 003
4 of 4 [* 4]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2024 NY Slip Op 31949(U), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fields-v-baker-hostetler-llp-nysupctnewyork-2024.