Fields-Sandy v. Cain

158 A.D.2d 666, 552 N.Y.S.2d 42, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2349

This text of 158 A.D.2d 666 (Fields-Sandy v. Cain) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fields-Sandy v. Cain, 158 A.D.2d 666, 552 N.Y.S.2d 42, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2349 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

Based on a review of the record, we conclude, contrary to the plaintiff’s position, that the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the plaintiff’s motion to vacate her default in answering the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The plaintiff’s motion papers failed to provide a reasonable excuse for her failure to oppose the defendant’s summary judgment motion and her delay of approximately one year in moving to vacate her default. Additionally, the plaintiff failed to provide a reasonable excuse for failing to provide a timely affidavit of merits (see, Brann v City of New York, 96 AD2d 923). In view of these circumstances, as well as the prejudice which would inure to the defendant if the order granting his motion for summary judgment was vacated, we conclude that the Supreme Court acted properly in denying the plaintiff’s motion. Mollen, P. J., Lawrence, Rosenblatt and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brann v. City of New York
96 A.D.2d 923 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
158 A.D.2d 666, 552 N.Y.S.2d 42, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2349, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fields-sandy-v-cain-nyappdiv-1990.