Fielding v. State
118 S.E. 601, 30 Ga. App. 664, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 606
Opinion
“ Fielder ” and “ Fielding. ” are, as a matter of law, idem sonans; and therefore the trial judge did not err in directing a verdict against the defendant’s plea of misnomer. See, in this connection, Biggers v. State, 109 Ga. 105 (1) (34 S. E. 210); Woody v. State, 113 Ga. 927 (1) (39 S. E. 297); Lovett v. State, 9 Ga. App. 232 (1) (70 S. E. 989); Watkins v. State, 18 Ga. App. 500 (89 S. E. 624), and cases cited. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fielding v. State, 118 S.E. 601, 30 Ga. App. 664, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 606 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).
118 S.E. 601 (Fielding v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Abner v. State
229 S.E.2d 83 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1976)
Champion v. Martin
183 S.E.2d 571 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1971)
Dees v. State
152 S.E. 913 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)
Chapman v. State
126 S.E. 895 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)