Fielding v. Hartman
This text of 117 A.D.2d 583 (Fielding v. Hartman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Gurahian, J.), dated December 7, 1984, as denied his motion for summary judgment.
Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
Special Term properly denied defendant’s motion on the ground that the supporting papers raised issues of fact (CPLR 3212 [b]; see, Behar v Ordover, 92 AD2d 557, 558). Mollen, P. J., Thompson, Rubin and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
117 A.D.2d 583, 498 N.Y.S.2d 997, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52851, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fielding-v-hartman-nyappdiv-1986.