Fielding v. Hartman
117 A.D.2d 583, 498 N.Y.S.2d 997, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52851
Opinion
—In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Gurahian, J.), dated December 7, 1984, as denied his motion for summary judgment.
Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
Special Term properly denied defendant’s motion on the ground that the supporting papers raised issues of fact (CPLR 3212 [b]; see, Behar v Ordover, 92 AD2d 557, 558). Mollen, P. J., Thompson, Rubin and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fielding v. Hartman, 117 A.D.2d 583, 498 N.Y.S.2d 997, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52851 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).
117 A.D.2d 583 (Fielding v. Hartman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Behar v. Ordover
92 A.D.2d 557 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)