Fielding v. Casualty Reciprocal Exchange
334 So. 2d 217
This text of 334 So. 2d 217 (Fielding v. Casualty Reciprocal Exchange) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Fielding v. Casualty Reciprocal Exchange, 334 So. 2d 217 (La. 1976).
Opinion
Virginia FIELDING
v.
CASUALTY RECIPROCAL EXCHANGE.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Writ denied. The facts found by the Court of Appeal show no error of law in its judgment.
TATE, J., dissents, agreeing with the dissenting judges in the Court of Appeal, since the trial court's factual finding was supported by factual evidence found by it to be credible.
DIXON, J., dissents from denial.
CALOGERO, J., dissents.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
334 So. 2d 217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fielding-v-casualty-reciprocal-exchange-la-1976.