Field v. Thistle

46 A. 1099, 60 N.J. Eq. 444, 15 Dickinson 444, 1899 N.J. LEXIS 187
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided June 18, 1900·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons given by Vice-Chancellor Emery.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, • Chief-Justice, Van Syckel, G-ummere, Ludlow, Bogert, Hendrickson, Adams, Vredenburgh — 9.

For reversal — Dixon, Lippincott, Collins — 3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Field v. Thistle, 46 A. 1099, 60 N.J. Eq. 444, 15 Dickinson 444, 1899 N.J. LEXIS 187 (N.J. 1900).

46 A. 1099 (Field v. Thistle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fisk v. Wuensch
171 A. 174 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1934)