Field v. Stout

68 Ill. App. 360, 1896 Ill. App. LEXIS 498
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedDecember 9, 1896
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 68 Ill. App. 360 (Field v. Stout) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Field v. Stout, 68 Ill. App. 360, 1896 Ill. App. LEXIS 498 (Ill. Ct. App. 1896).

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Harker

delivered the opinion oe 'the Court.

On the 23d of February, 1895, the entire - stock of goods which appellee, a retail merchant at Wenona, Illinois, owned, was destroyed by fire. It was insured for $10,000. Appellee was at the time indebted to the amount of $14,000 or $15,000. He was indebted to appellants $637.03. He owed his father about $1,500, and his father was, in addition, bound as security for him to the extent of several thousand dollars.

On the 25th of February, 1895, appellee assigned the insurance policies to his father, who subsequently obtained an adjustment of the loss-for $9,400, which was all applied -upon the indebtedness.

On the 26th of February appellants commenced suit by attachment, claiming that appellee had fraudulently assigned his property for the purpose of defrauding his creditors. The issues upon the attachment were decided in favor of the defendant, but the jury found the defendant was indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of $637.03, and judgment was rendered accordingly.

Appellants ask a reversal of the judgment as to the attachment.

The only question involved is whether the assignment of the policies of insurance to appellee’s father was for the purpose of hindering and delaying appellee’s creditors in the collection of their debts. That appeljee had the right to prefer his father and other of his creditors, is too well settled in Illinois to require the citation of authorities.

The purpose of the assignment was to enable the father to pay in full his own debt and the debts that he had become legally and morally bound for.

It does not seem that there was any intention that appellee should have returned to him any part of the money that should be collected on the policies, or that there was any arrangement or understanding that any of it should be used except in discharge of legal indebtedness.

Every dollar was used in that way. The verdict and judgment were right, and it is unnecessary to discuss instructions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Amcore Bank, N.A., Rock River Valley v. Hahnaman-Albrecht, Inc.
710 N.E.2d 435 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
68 Ill. App. 360, 1896 Ill. App. LEXIS 498, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/field-v-stout-illappct-1896.