Field v. Sapowitch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Field v. Sapowitch

258 A.D. 931, 17 N.Y.S.2d 618, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7623

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 27, 1939·Published

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: The verdict in favor of plaintiff is sustained by the evidence and is not against its weight. We find no reversible error in the charge in respect to the rules of the road. All concur. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an automobile negligence action. The order denies a moti.on for [932]*932a new trial.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: The verdict in favor of plaintiff is sustained by the evidence and is not against its weight. We find no reversible error in the charge in respect to the rules of the road. All concur. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an automobile negligence action. The order denies a moti.on for [932]*932a new trial.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham and Taylor, JJ.

Field v. Sapowitch, 258 A.D. 931, 17 N.Y.S.2d 618, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7623 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

258 A.D. 931 (Field v. Sapowitch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.