Field v. Robinson

48 A. 873, 198 Pa. 638, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 854
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 1, 1901·No. Appeal, No. 335·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

We think the court below did not err in the ruling referred to in the assignments. In Duffield v. Williamsport School District, 162 Pa. 476, we held that school directors, in the exercise of a sound discretion, may exclude from the public schools pupils who have not been vaccinated. “ Whether a resolution excluding from the school pupils who have not been vaccinated, is a reasonable one, is to be judged of in the first [639] instance by the school directors. In the present state of medical knowledge and of convincing opinion of those having charge of the public health, the courts will not say that such a resolution is an abuse of official discretion.” It has not been shown to our satisfaction that the Act of June 18, 1895, P. L. 208, is unconstitutional. For the reasons above stated we dismiss the assignments and sustain the conclusions of the court below.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Field v. Robinson, 48 A. 873, 198 Pa. 638, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 854 (Pa. 1901).

48 A. 873 (Field v. Robinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Abney v. Fox
250 S.W. 210 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1923)
Commonwealth v. Butler
76 Pa. Super. 113 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1921)
Rhea ex rel. Rhea v. Board of Education
171 N.W. 103 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1919)
Herbert v. Board of Education
73 So. 321 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1916)
Commonwealth v. Gillen
65 Pa. Super. 31 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1916)
Commonwealth v. Aiken
64 Pa. Super. 96 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1916)
Stull v. Reber
64 A. 419 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1906)
Viemeister v. White
84 N.Y.S. 712 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903)