Field v. McMaster

398 F. App'x 894
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 20, 2010·No. No. 10-1957·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Arthur M. Field, Kathryn Taillon, and T. Bart Kelley appeal the district court’s order adopting in part the magistrate judge’s recommendation and granting summary judgment in favor of several state employees in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny [895]*895the Appellants’ motion to file a state transcript as an attachment to their informal brief and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Field v. McMaster, No. 6:09-cv-01949-HMH, 2010 WL 3257888 (D.S.C. Aug. 17, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Field v. McMaster, 398 F. App'x 894 (4th Cir. 2010).

398 F. App'x 894 (Field v. McMaster) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Field v. McMaster
179 L. Ed. 2d 654 (Supreme Court, 2011)