Field v. Mans

CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit
DecidedSeptember 13, 1994
Docket94-1391
StatusPublished

This text of Field v. Mans (Field v. Mans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Field v. Mans, (1st Cir. 1994).

Opinion

USCA1 Opinion


August 29, 1994
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

____________________

No. 94-1391

WILLIAM FIELD AND NORINNE FIELD,

Plaintiffs, Appellants,

v.

PHILIP W. MANS,

Defendant, Appellee.

____________________

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

[Hon. Martin F. Loughlin, U.S. Senior District Judge]
__________________________

____________________

Before

Torruella, Chief Judge,
___________
Selya and Cyr, Circuit Judges.
______________

____________________

Christopher J. Seufert on brief for appellants.
______________________
Philip W. Mans on brief pro se.
______________

____________________

____________________

Per Curiam. Having reviewed carefully the briefs and
__________

the record in this case, we affirm the judgment of the

district court, affirming the decision of the bankruptcy

court denying appellants' request to have the debt of

approximately $150,000 of appellee to appellants excepted

from discharge under 11 U.S.C. 523(a)(2)(A).

This circuit has determined that to establish that a

debt is nondischargeable under 11 U.S.C. 523(a)(2)(A) a

creditor must prove, inter alia, that his "reliance was
_____ ____

reasonable in the circumstances." In re Burgess, 955 F.2d
______________

134, 140 (1st Cir. 1992). Since we find no clear error, see
___

In re Corporacion de Servicios Medicos Hospitalarios de
_____________________________________________________________

Fajardo, 805 F.2d 440, 447-48 (1st Cir. 1986) (determination
_______

of reasonableness reviewed for clear error), in the finding

by the bankruptcy court that the creditors' reliance in this

case was not reasonable, the judgment below is affirmed.1
________

____________________

1. In bankruptcy matters, this court conducts an independent
review of both the factual and legal findings of the
bankruptcy court. In re G.S.F. Corp., 938 F.2d 1467, 1474
__________________
(1st Cir. 1991). Therefore, any error committed by the
district court in findings of fact during its review of the
bankruptcy court decision would be harmless.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Field v. Mans, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/field-v-mans-ca1-1994.