Field v. Mans
This text of Field v. Mans (Field v. Mans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Field v. Mans, (1st Cir. 1994).
Opinion
USCA1 Opinion
August 29, 1994
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
____________________
No. 94-1391
WILLIAM FIELD AND NORINNE FIELD,
Plaintiffs, Appellants,
v.
PHILIP W. MANS,
Defendant, Appellee.
____________________
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
[Hon. Martin F. Loughlin, U.S. Senior District Judge]
__________________________
____________________
Before
Torruella, Chief Judge,
___________
Selya and Cyr, Circuit Judges.
______________
____________________
Christopher J. Seufert on brief for appellants.
______________________
Philip W. Mans on brief pro se.
______________
____________________
____________________
Per Curiam. Having reviewed carefully the briefs and
__________
the record in this case, we affirm the judgment of the
district court, affirming the decision of the bankruptcy
court denying appellants' request to have the debt of
approximately $150,000 of appellee to appellants excepted
from discharge under 11 U.S.C. 523(a)(2)(A).
This circuit has determined that to establish that a
debt is nondischargeable under 11 U.S.C. 523(a)(2)(A) a
creditor must prove, inter alia, that his "reliance was
_____ ____
reasonable in the circumstances." In re Burgess, 955 F.2d
______________
134, 140 (1st Cir. 1992). Since we find no clear error, see
___
In re Corporacion de Servicios Medicos Hospitalarios de
_____________________________________________________________
Fajardo, 805 F.2d 440, 447-48 (1st Cir. 1986) (determination
_______
of reasonableness reviewed for clear error), in the finding
by the bankruptcy court that the creditors' reliance in this
case was not reasonable, the judgment below is affirmed.1
________
____________________
1. In bankruptcy matters, this court conducts an independent
review of both the factual and legal findings of the
bankruptcy court. In re G.S.F. Corp., 938 F.2d 1467, 1474
__________________
(1st Cir. 1991). Therefore, any error committed by the
district court in findings of fact during its review of the
bankruptcy court decision would be harmless.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In Re G.S.F. CORPORATION, Debtor, Chase Commercial Corporation, Appellant
938 F.2d 1467 (First Circuit, 1991)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Field v. Mans, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/field-v-mans-ca1-1994.