Field v. Howland
17 Johns. 85
This text of 17 Johns. 85 (Field v. Howland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Field v. Howland, 17 Johns. 85 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1819).
Opinion
The conduct of the plaintiff’s attorney is equivalent to an abandonment of his suit; and if the defendant had applied, after obtaining a regular discharge under the act, for a discontinuance, we should have ordered a rule for that purpose, to be entered. We think, under these circumstances, that the motion ought to be granted.
Motion granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Collins & Co. v. Rodolph
3 Greene 299 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1851)
Graham v. Pierson
6 Hill & Den. 247 (New York Supreme Court, 1843)
President v. Osgood
1 Cow. 65 (New York Supreme Court, 1823)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
17 Johns. 85, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/field-v-howland-nysupct-1819.