Field v. Anderson

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Field v. Anderson

18 S.W. 1038, 55 Ark. 546, 1892 Ark. LEXIS 57

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedMarch 12, 1892

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 18 S.W. 1038 (Field v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Field v. Anderson, 18 S.W. 1038, 55 Ark. 546, 1892 Ark. LEXIS 57 (Ark. 1892).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It was necessary for the appellant either to produce the note or to account for it, in order to show that he was entitled to collect it. The allegation that it was lost was material. Norris v. Kellogg, 7 Ark., 118. That allegation was denied by the answer, it was not proved upon the trial, and the note was not produced. If there were no other reason for dismissing the complaint, that would be .sufficient.

Affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

It was necessary for the appellant either to produce the note or to account for it, in order to show that he was entitled to collect it. The allegation that it was lost was material. Norris v. Kellogg, 7 Ark., 118. That allegation was denied by the answer, it was not proved upon the trial, and the note was not produced. If there were no other reason for dismissing the complaint, that would be .sufficient.

Affirm.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 S.W. 1038, 55 Ark. 546, 1892 Ark. LEXIS 57, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/field-v-anderson-ark-1892.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack