Field Family Construction Co. v. Ryan

Supreme Court of Colorado

Field Family Construction Co. v. Ryan

860 P.2d 110, 145 Colo. 598, 1961 Colo. LEXIS 709

CourtSupreme Court of Colorado

DecidedMarch 13, 1961

DocketNo. 19,241

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 860 P.2d 110 (Field Family Construction Co. v. Ryan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Field Family Construction Co. v. Ryan, 860 P.2d 110, 145 Colo. 598, 1961 Colo. LEXIS 709 (Colo. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Sutton.

The parties appear here in reverse order of their appearance in the trial court and will be referred to as they there appeared.

Plaintiff obtained a money judgment for $3,375.00 against the Florado Construction Company on August 12, 1959. The judgment was on a contract for the sale of houses belonging to Florado, which were completed by Field Family Construction Co., garnishee below, which received the proceeds from the sales. Motion for new trial was heard and denied and a writ of execution on the Florado’s judgment was thereafter issued and returned unsatisfied. A writ of garnishment was served on the garnishee on August 28, 1959, which answered denying that it was indebted to the Florado Company. Plaintiff traversed the answer and trial was had to the court. Judgment was entered in favor of plaintiff and garnishee prosecutes this writ of error.

The basis of plaintiff’s case is the agreement of garnishee Field Family Construction Co. to assume the debts of Florado Company. This agreement, which appeared by resolution in the company minutes, was adjudged by the trial court to be the basis of the garnishee’s liability to plaintiff.

We are satisfied that Wilson v. Sauve (1927), 81 Colo. 118, 253 Pac. 1065, is determinative of the issues here. It was there held that where one, for a valuable consideration, has assumed the obligation of another to plaintiff, he may be held liable as garnishee. In such a situation it is not necessary that the garnishee hold tangible real or personal property of the debtor. The assumption of the debts of another when in proper form [600]*600is a right, credit or chose in action required to be reported in garnishment proceedings under Rule 103 (a), R.C.P. Colo. (See definitions of chose in action in 1 Bouvier’s Law Dictionary.)

In the instant case there was an assumption of all of Florado’s debts by the garnishee except the items not involved here. The consideration for this agreement was the undertaking of Field Family to complete certain houses under construction by Florado and to receive all funds due from Guardian Savings and Loan Association; all deposits from sales and closings, and to assume the debts of Florado. This constituted adequate consideration for the agreement.

The judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Day and Mr. Justice Doyle concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Sutton.

The parties appear here in reverse order of their appearance in the trial court and will be referred to as they there appeared.

Plaintiff obtained a money judgment for $3,375.00 against the Florado Construction Company on August 12, 1959. The judgment was on a contract for the sale of houses belonging to Florado, which were completed by Field Family Construction Co., garnishee below, which received the proceeds from the sales. Motion for new trial was heard and denied and a writ of execution on the Florado’s judgment was thereafter issued and returned unsatisfied. A writ of garnishment was served on the garnishee on August 28, 1959, which answered denying that it was indebted to the Florado Company. Plaintiff traversed the answer and trial was had to the court. Judgment was entered in favor of plaintiff and garnishee prosecutes this writ of error.

The basis of plaintiff’s case is the agreement of garnishee Field Family Construction Co. to assume the debts of Florado Company. This agreement, which appeared by resolution in the company minutes, was adjudged by the trial court to be the basis of the garnishee’s liability to plaintiff.

We are satisfied that Wilson v. Sauve (1927), 81 Colo. 118, 253 Pac. 1065, is determinative of the issues here. It was there held that where one, for a valuable consideration, has assumed the obligation of another to plaintiff, he may be held liable as garnishee. In such a situation it is not necessary that the garnishee hold tangible real or personal property of the debtor. The assumption of the debts of another when in proper form [600]*600is a right, credit or chose in action required to be reported in garnishment proceedings under Rule 103 (a), R.C.P. Colo. (See definitions of chose in action in 1 Bouvier’s Law Dictionary.)

In the instant case there was an assumption of all of Florado’s debts by the garnishee except the items not involved here. The consideration for this agreement was the undertaking of Field Family to complete certain houses under construction by Florado and to receive all funds due from Guardian Savings and Loan Association; all deposits from sales and closings, and to assume the debts of Florado. This constituted adequate consideration for the agreement.

The judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Day and Mr. Justice Doyle concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

860 P.2d 110, 145 Colo. 598, 1961 Colo. LEXIS 709, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/field-family-construction-co-v-ryan-colo-1961.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack