Fieder v. Terstiege
273 A.D. 982, 79 N.Y.S.2d 513, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5589
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 26, 1948·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
—‘In an action to restrain interference with appellants’ use and enjoyment of certain land designated as “ park ” and “ beach ” on a filed map, to which map appellants’ deeds make reference, judgment in favor of defendants, dismissing the complaint on the merits, after trial by the court without a jury, unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fieder v. Terstiege, 273 A.D. 982, 79 N.Y.S.2d 513, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5589 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1948).
273 A.D. 982 (Fieder v. Terstiege) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Huggins v. Castle Estates, Inc.
44 A.D.2d 25 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1974)
Sterrer v. Genoa
64 Misc. 2d 502 (New York Supreme Court, 1970)
Sargent v. Brunner Housing Corp.
52 Misc. 2d 623 (New York Supreme Court, 1967)
Mehene v. Ball
22 Misc. 2d 577 (New York Supreme Court, 1959)
Wilkinson v. Nassau Shores, Inc.
1 Misc. 2d 917 (New York Supreme Court, 1949)