Fieder v. Terstiege
This text of 273 A.D. 982 (Fieder v. Terstiege) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—‘In an action to restrain interference with appellants’ use and enjoyment of certain land designated as “ park ” and “ beach ” on a filed map, to which map appellants’ deeds make reference, judgment in favor of defendants, dismissing the complaint on the merits, after trial by the court without a jury, unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
273 A.D. 982, 79 N.Y.S.2d 513, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5589, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fieder-v-terstiege-nyappdiv-1948.