Fidus Investment Corporation v. McCollum
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:19-CV-00312-GCM WEST INVESTMENT FOREIGN SHARES, LLC, FIDUS INVESTMENT CORPORATION,
Plaintiffs,
v. ORDER
JOHN SHAW, MCCOLLUM BUSINESS, LLC, GROVE 1005, LLC, DANIEL A. MCCOLLUM,
Defendants,
v.
DRIVETRAIN, LLC, TIM DAILEADER, HURON CONSULTING GROUP, INC.,
Third-Party Defendants.
THIS MATTER is before the Court upon Defendant Daniel A. McCollum’s Motion to Seal and Incorporated Memorandum in Support [ECF Doc. 85]. When a party makes a request to seal judicial records, the Court must (1) give the public notice and a reasonable opportunity to challenge the request to seal; (2) “consider less drastic alternatives to sealing;” and (3) if it decides to seal, make specific findings and state the reasons for its decision to seal rather than choosing other alternatives. Virginia Dep’t of State Police v. Washington Post, 386 F.3d 567, 576 (4th Cir. 2004). In accordance with the law of this Circuit as well as the Local Rules, the Court has considered the Motion to Seal, the public’s interest in access to such materials, and alternatives to sealing. The public has been provided with adequate notice and an opportunity to object to the Defendant McCollum’s motion. Defendant McCollum filed his motion on December 2, 2020 and it has been accessible to the public through the Court’s electronic case filing system since that time. The Court determines that no less restrictive means other than sealing is sufficient because a public filing of such materials would potentially endanger Defendant McCollum’s Fifth Amendment rights, his interest in adequately defending his civil case, and the interest of the government in its ongoing criminal investigation. The Court concludes that the sealing of these documents is narrowly tailored to serve the interest of protecting information related to the ongoing criminal investigation.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant Daniel A. McCollum’s Motion to Seal and Incorporated Memorandum in Support [ECF Doc. 85] is hereby GRANTED, and the Motion to Stay Pending Resolution of Criminal Investigation and Incorporated Memorandum in Support of his Motion to Stay, as well as any responses, replies, or other documents related to the same shall be filed under seal until further order of this Court.
SO ORDERED.
Signed: December 8, 2020 Laban! Leubhe— United States District Judge ge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fidus Investment Corporation v. McCollum (Fidus Investment Corporation v. McCollum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.