Fiducia v. Magenheim
45 A.2d 315, 133 N.J.L. 560, 1946 N.J. LEXIS 194
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Colie, Oliphant, Wells, Raeeerty, Dill, Freund, McGeehan, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fiducia v. Magenheim, 45 A.2d 315, 133 N.J.L. 560, 1946 N.J. LEXIS 194 (N.J. 1946).
45 A.2d 315 (Fiducia v. Magenheim) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.