Fiducia v. Magenheim

45 A.2d 315, 133 N.J.L. 560, 1946 N.J. LEXIS 194
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJanuary 3, 1946
StatusPublished

This text of 45 A.2d 315 (Fiducia v. Magenheim) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fiducia v. Magenheim, 45 A.2d 315, 133 N.J.L. 560, 1946 N.J. LEXIS 194 (N.J. 1946).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Colie, Oliphant, Wells, Raeeerty, Dill, Freund, McGeehan, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
45 A.2d 315, 133 N.J.L. 560, 1946 N.J. LEXIS 194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fiducia-v-magenheim-nj-1946.