Fidler v. Hayes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Fidler v. Hayes

77 A.D.2d 940, 431 N.Y.S.2d 125, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12733

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 22, 1980

StatusPublished

This text of 77 A.D.2d 940 (Fidler v. Hayes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fidler v. Hayes, 77 A.D.2d 940, 431 N.Y.S.2d 125, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12733 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding, inter alia, to invalidate a petition designating Edward A. Hayes as a candidate in the Democratic Party primary election to be held on September 9, 1980, for the public office of Representative to the United States Congress from the 16th Congressional District, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated August 19, 1980, which, inter alia, dismissed the proceeding. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. In the absence of any evidence to refute subscribing witness Jeannie Hayes’ claim that she lived in the 16th Congressional District, Special Term acted properly in dismissing the proceeding to invalidate the designating petition. Mollen, P. J., Damiani, Mangano, Gulotta and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding, inter alia, to invalidate a petition designating Edward A. Hayes as a candidate in the Democratic Party primary election to be held on September 9, 1980, for the public office of Representative to the United States Congress from the 16th Congressional District, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated August 19, 1980, which, inter alia, dismissed the proceeding. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. In the absence of any evidence to refute subscribing witness Jeannie Hayes’ claim that she lived in the 16th Congressional District, Special Term acted properly in dismissing the proceeding to invalidate the designating petition. Mollen, P. J., Damiani, Mangano, Gulotta and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

77 A.D.2d 940, 431 N.Y.S.2d 125, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12733, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fidler-v-hayes-nyappdiv-1980.