Fidencio Castillo Cosme v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 29, 2022·No. 13-21-00282-CR·Published

Opinion

NUMBER 13-21-00282-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

FIDENCIO CASTILLO COSME, Appellant, v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 370th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.

ORDER

Before Justices Benavides, Hinojosa, and Silva Order Per Curiam

Before the Court is appellant’s pro se motion for access to the appellate record.

On June 8, 2022, appellant’s counsel filed an Anders brief, and appellant has been unable to examine the record in order to file a pro se brief.

Accordingly, we grant appellant’s motion and it is hereby ordered that the trial court ensure that appellant has the opportunity to fully examine the appellate record on or

before fifteen (15) days from the date this order issues. It is further ordered the trial court notify this Court as to the date upon which the appellate record was made available to appellant. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014).

Furthermore, appellant shall have thirty (30) days from the day the appellate record is first made available to him to file his pro se brief with this Court. The State shall have twenty days thereafter to file its response, if any.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed on the 29th day of June, 2022.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fidencio Castillo Cosme v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Fidencio Castillo Cosme v. the State of Texas (Fidencio Castillo Cosme v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kelly, Sylvester
436 S.W.3d 313 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2014)