Home/Court of Appeals of Tennessee/Fideltity and Casualty Company of New York v. Gregory Entertainment, Inc.

Fideltity and Casualty Company of New York v. Gregory Entertainment, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Tennessee
DecidedMarch 31, 1999
Docket01-A-0-9804-CH00203
StatusPublished

This text of Fideltity and Casualty Company of New York v. Gregory Entertainment, Inc. (Fideltity and Casualty Company of New York v. Gregory Entertainment, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fideltity and Casualty Company of New York v. Gregory Entertainment, Inc., (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

IN T H E C O U R T O F A P P E A L S O F T E N N E S S E E

A T N A S H V IL L E FL E I D M a rc h 3 1 , 1 9 9 9 F ID E L IT Y & C A S U A L T Y C O . ) C e c il C r o w s o n , J r . O F N E W Y O R K , ) A p p e lla te C o u r t C le r k ) P la in tiff /A p p e lla n t, ) A p p e al N o . ) 0 1 -A -0 1 -9 8 0 4 -C H -0 0 2 0 3 v . ) ) W illia m s o n C h a n c e ry G R E G O R Y E N T E R T A I N M E N T , I N C .) N o . II 2 4 9 1 4 R 2 ) D e fe n d a n t/A p p e lle e . )

A P P E A L F R O M T H E C H A N C E R Y C O U R T O F W IL L IA M S O N C O U N T Y A T F R A N K L IN , T E N N E S S E E

T H E H O N O R A B L E H E N R Y D E N M A R K B E L L , JU D G E

D A V ID A . L U F K IN L U F K IN H E N L E Y & C O N N E R A tto rn e y s a t L a w 5 3 0 S . G a y S t. 7 th F l o o r K n o x v ille , T e n n e s s e e 3 7 9 0 2

A tto rn e y fo r P la in tiff /A p p e lla n t

J . R U S S E L L F A R R A R J O H N E . C A R T E R F A R R A R & B A T E S , L .L .P . 2 1 1 S e v e n th A v e n u e, N ., S u i te 3 2 0 N a sh v ille , T e n n esse e 3 7 2 1 9 -1 8 2 3

A tto rn e y s fo r D e fe n d a n t/A p p e lle e

R E V E R S E D A N D R E M A N D E D P A T R IC IA J. C O T T R E L L , JU D G E

C O N C U R : K O C H , J. C A IN , J . M E M O R A N D U M O P IN IO N

T h e p r im a r y i s s u e i n t h i s c a s e is w h e t h e r th e t r ia l c o u r t s h o u ld h a v e g r a n te d P l a i n t i f f ’ s m o t i o n t o a m e n d i t s c o m p l a i n t t o c o r r e c t d e f i c i e n c i e s th a t w e r e r a is e d b y D e fe n d a n t i n a m o t i o n f o r ju d g m e n t o n th e p le a d i n g s . P l a in t i f f d i s p u t e s t h a t t h e C o m p l a i n t i s d e f i c i e n t , b u t r e q u e s t e d to b e a ll o w e d to a m e n d th e C o m p l a in t b y a tt a c h i n g d i s c o v e r a b l e d o c u m e n ts t h a t w o u l d h a v e b e e n i n t r o d u c e d a t t r i a l. W e a r e o f t h e o p in i o n t h a t l e a v e to a m e n d s h o u l d h a v e b e e n g r a n te d . T h e u n d e rl y in g la w s u i t i n v o lv e s t h e A p p e ll a n t i n s u r e r ’ s a t t e m p t s t o c o l l e c t p a y m e n t f o r w o r k e rs c o m p e n s a ti o n in s u r a n c e c o v e ra g e w h i c h A p p e ll a n t a s s e r t s w a s p r o v id e d a n d A p p e ll e e d e n ie s w a s p u r c h a s e d . T h e p a r ti e s ’ f i l i n g s i n t h e t r i a l c o u rt i n d i c a t e t h a t th e y w e r e c le a r ly a w a r e o f th e b a s is o f th e d is p u te . F id e lity a n d C a s u a lty c la im s it p ro v id e d a b e n e f i t ( w o r k e r s ’ c o m p e n s a t io n i n s u r a n c e c o v e r a g e ) a n d th a t G r e g o ry E n t e r t a in m e n t f a il e d to p r o v i d e c o m p e n s a ti o n f o r th a t b e n e fit. F ro m t h e b e g i n n i n g o f t h e la w s u i t , G r e g o ry E n t e rt a in m e n t h a s d e fe n d e d o n th e b a s is it n e v e r s ig n e d a c o n tra c t w ith F id e lity a n d C a s u a lty to p r o v i d e th e in s u r a n c e c o v e ra g e . W h a t c o u ld h a v e b e e n a re la tiv e ly s tra ig h tfo rw a rd la w s u it b e c a m e p r o c e d u r a lly c o m p lic a te d . A d is c o v e ry d is p u te e m e rg e d w h e n G re g o ry E n te rta in m e n t s o u g h t to d e p o s e F i d e l it y ’ s e m p l o y e e w h o s e a ff id a v it w a s a tta c h e d t o th e C o m p la in t. T h e d e p o s itio n w a s n o tic e d f o r t w o d a y s b e f o r e C h r i s t m a s , b y n o tic e d a te d D e c e m b e r 3 . I n i t i a l l y , o n D e c e m b e r 2 2 , F i d e li t y r e s i s t e d th e d e p o sitio n c la im in g n o k n o w le d g e o f th a t e m p lo y e e , a n d re q u e s tin g th a t a n y d e p o sitio n s o f F id e lity b e ta k e n a t F id e lity ’s o ff ic e o r b y te le p h o n e o r in w ritin g . L a te r, F id e lity a tte m p te d to c o rr e c t its e rr o r r e g a rd in g its e m p lo y e e , b u t s o u g h t t o h a v e t h e d e p o s i t i o n o f t h e o u t- o f - s t a t e e m p l o y e e t a k e n b y w r i tt e n i n t e r r o g a t o r y o r b y te le p h o n e . M e a n w h i le , o t h e r s k i r m is h e s w e r e e s c a la tin g . T h e C o m p l a in t o n S w o r n A c c o u n t w a s f i l e d A u g u s t 2 8 , 1 9 9 7 ; th e A n s w e r w a s f ile d O c to b e r 1 3 , 1 9 9 7 ; P l a i n t if f f i l e d a M o t i o n f o r D e fa u lt J u d g m e n t; a n A m e n d e d A n s w e r ( u n d e r o a th ) w a s f ile d o n O c to b e r 2 7 , 1 9 9 7 ; D e fe n d a n t f ile d a M o tio n f o r J u d g m e n t o n th e P l e a d i n g s o n J a n u a r y 1 2 , 1 9 9 8 , a ll e g in g P l a in t if f f a i l e d t o s t a t e a c la i m and , a l t e r n a t i v e l y r e q u e s te d a c o n ti n u a n c e o f t h e tr i a l w h i c h h a d b e e n s e t f o r F e b r u a ry b y a g re e d o rd e r w h ic h a ls o w ith d re w th e m o t i o n f o r d e fa u lt ju d g m e n t; o n

2 J a n u a r y 2 8 , 1 9 9 8 , P l a in t i f f r e q u e s t e d a c o n ti n u a n c e o f t h e h e a ri n g o n t h e m o t i o n f o r ju d g m e n t o n th e p le a d i n g s , w h i c h h e a ri n g h a d b e e n s e t f o r J a n u a r y 2 6 ; o n F e b r u a ry 6 , 1 9 9 8 , P l a i n t i f f f i l e d a R e s p o n s e to D e fe n d a n t’ s M o ti o n f o r J u d g m e n t o n t h e P l e a d in g s ; o n F e b r u a r y 6 , 1 9 9 8 , t h e tr i a l c o u rt d i s m i s s e d th e c o m p l a in t w i t h o u t p r e ju d i c e , f i n d i n g d e fe n d a n t ’ s m o t i o n to b e w e ll t a k e n , a p p a r e n tl y f i n d i n g a d e f e c t u n d e r T e n n . R . C i v . P . 1 0 .0 3 in t h e fa il u r e t o a tt a c h d o c u m e n t( s ) u n d e rly in g th e la w s u it. T h e tria l c o u rt n o te d th a t P la in ti f f h a d s u g g e ste d a n y s u c h d e f e c t c o u ld b e c u r e d b y a m e n d m e n t. R u le 1 5 .0 1 o f th e T e n n e s s e e R u l e s o f C iv i l P r o c e d u r e p r o v id e s th a t le a v e to a m e n d “ s h a l l b e f re e ly g iv e n w h e n ju s tic e s o r e q u i r e s .” O u r S u p r e m e C o u r t h a s r e c o g n i z e d t h a t t h i s l a n g u a g e in R u l e 1 5 .0 1 “ s u b s t a n ti a ll y l e s s e n s t h e e x e r c is e o f p r e - tr ia l d is c r e tio n o n th e p a r t o f a tr ia l ju d g e .” B r a n c h v . W a r r e n , 5 2 7 S .W .2 d 8 9 a t 9 1 , 9 2 ( T e n n . 1 9 7 5 ); s e e a ls o C r a v e n v . L a w s o n , 5 3 4 S .W .2 d 6 5 3 , 6 5 5 (T e n n . 1 9 7 6 ). I n t h e i n s t a n t c a s e , ju d g m e n t o n th e p le a d i n g s w a s r e n d e r e d in f a v o r o f d e fe n d a n t r e s u l t i n g i n d i s m i s s a l o f t h e a c tio n . I n c o n s i d e ri n g w h e th e r to g r a n t a m e n d m e n t , a tr i a l c o u rt s h o u ld c o n s i d e r s e v e r a l f a c t o r s , i n c lu d i n g “ u n d u e d e la y i n f i l i n g t h e a m e n d m e n t , l a c k o f n o t i c e to th e o p p o s i n g p a rt y , b a d fa it h b y th e m o v i n g p a rt y , a n d th e fu t i l i t y o f a m e n d m e n t.” G a r d i n e r v . W o r d , 7 3 1 S . W .2 d 8 8 9 , 8 9 1 - 9 2 ( T e n n . 1 9 8 7 ) . T h e tr i a l c o u rt d i d n o t a d d re s s a n y o f t h e s e fa c t o r s , a n d b a s e d u p o n o u r r e v ie w o f th e e n ti r e re c o r d , w e a r e u n a b le to f i n d a n y o f th e fa c to rs m ilita tin g a g a in s t a m e n d m e n t o r a n y in ju s tic e w h ich w o u ld re su lt fro m a m e n d m e n t.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Fideltity and Casualty Company of New York v. Gregory Entertainment, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fideltity-and-casualty-company-of-new-york-v-grego-tennctapp-1999.