Fidellow v. Weaver

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Fidellow v. Weaver

9 A.D.2d 905, 195 N.Y.S.2d 602, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5575

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 14, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 9 A.D.2d 905 (Fidellow v. Weaver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fidellow v. Weaver, 9 A.D.2d 905, 195 N.Y.S.2d 602, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5575 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding to review a determination of the State Rent Administrator which denied an application to decontrol certain housing accommodations, the Administrator appeals from an order annulling the determination and directing him to issue orders of decontrol. Order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Wenzel, Beldock, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur; Nolan, P. J., dissents and votes to reverse the order and to dismiss the proceeding, with the following memorandum: The State Rent Administrator’s position appears to have been consistent throughout this proceeding and his determination, which follows his own interpretation of his regulations, does not appear to be arbitrary or capricious.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding to review a determination of the State Rent Administrator which denied an application to decontrol certain housing accommodations, the Administrator appeals from an order annulling the determination and directing him to issue orders of decontrol. Order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Wenzel, Beldock, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur; Nolan, P. J., dissents and votes to reverse the order and to dismiss the proceeding, with the following memorandum: The State Rent Administrator’s position appears to have been consistent throughout this proceeding and his determination, which follows his own interpretation of his regulations, does not appear to be arbitrary or capricious.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 A.D.2d 905, 195 N.Y.S.2d 602, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5575, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fidellow-v-weaver-nyappdiv-1959.