Fidelity v. Dietz

18 A. 1090, 132 Pa. 36, 1890 Pa. LEXIS 764
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJanuary 20, 1890
DocketNo. 306
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 18 A. 1090 (Fidelity v. Dietz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fidelity v. Dietz, 18 A. 1090, 132 Pa. 36, 1890 Pa. LEXIS 764 (Pa. 1890).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

There was no error in entering judgment in this case for want of a sufficient affidavit of defence. If the action of the court below needs any vindication, it will be found in the opinion of its learned president. On that opinion

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Estate of Cummings
425 A.2d 340 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1981)
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. Pearson
154 F.2d 256 (Third Circuit, 1946)
Board of Education v. Winding Gulf Collieries
152 F.2d 382 (Fourth Circuit, 1945)
Pearson v. Commissioner
4 T.C. 218 (U.S. Tax Court, 1944)
Penrose v. United States
18 F. Supp. 413 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1937)
Gorman's Estate
184 A. 86 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1936)
Du Puy v. Commissioner
32 B.T.A. 969 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1935)
Kenworthy's Estate
21 Pa. D. & C. 150 (Philadelphia County Orphans' Court, 1934)
Egan v. Innes
11 Pa. D. & C. 777 (Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas, 1928)
Kirkpatrick's Estate
131 A. 361 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 A. 1090, 132 Pa. 36, 1890 Pa. LEXIS 764, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fidelity-v-dietz-pa-1890.