Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. Martin
119 N.J.L. 425
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Perskie in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — PARKER, LLOYD, BODINE, DONGES, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 6.
For modification — HEHER, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, JJ. 3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. Martin, 119 N.J.L. 425 (N.J. 1938).
119 N.J.L. 425 (Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Johns Hopkins University v. Kuchel
206 P.2d 420 (California Court of Appeal, 1949)