Fidelity Security Co. v. Hight

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Fidelity Security Co. v. Hight

189 S.E. 174, 211 N.C. 117, 1937 N.C. LEXIS 15

DecidedJanuary 6, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 189 S.E. 174 (Fidelity Security Co. v. Hight) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fidelity Security Co. v. Hight, 189 S.E. 174, 211 N.C. 117, 1937 N.C. LEXIS 15 (N.C. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

It is not perceived wherein the present ease differs in principle from the case of Jones v. Franklin Estate, 209 N. C., 585, 183 S. E., 732. Moreover, it is conceded that since the levy of the assessment in the instant case, 3 November, 1931, holders of bank stock have been relieved of their double liability by act of Assembly, ch. 99, Public Laws 1935. So, unless the defendants were rendered liable by the original assessment, they cannot now be made liable therefor.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cueiam.

It is not perceived wherein the present ease differs in principle from the case of Jones v. Franklin Estate, 209 N. C., 585, 183 S. E., 732. Moreover, it is conceded that since the levy of the assessment in the instant case, 3 November, 1931, holders of bank stock have been relieved of their double liability by act of Assembly, ch. 99, Public Laws 1935. So, unless the defendants were rendered liable by the original assessment, they cannot now be made liable therefor.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

189 S.E. 174, 211 N.C. 117, 1937 N.C. LEXIS 15, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fidelity-security-co-v-hight-nc-1937.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack