Fidelity Security Co. v. Hight
189 S.E. 174, 211 N.C. 117, 1937 N.C. LEXIS 15
Opinion
It is not perceived wherein the present ease differs in principle from the case of Jones v. Franklin Estate, 209 N. C., 585, 183 S. E., 732. Moreover, it is conceded that since the levy of the assessment in the instant case, 3 November, 1931, holders of bank stock have been relieved of their double liability by act of Assembly, ch. 99, Public Laws 1935. So, unless the defendants were rendered liable by the original assessment, they cannot now be made liable therefor.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fidelity Security Co. v. Hight, 189 S.E. 174, 211 N.C. 117, 1937 N.C. LEXIS 15 (N.C. 1937).
189 S.E. 174 (Fidelity Security Co. v. Hight) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jones v. . Franklin Estate
183 S.E. 732 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1936)