Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co. v. North Philadelphia Trust Co.
This text of 196 A. 20 (Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co. v. North Philadelphia Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
Defendants took a rule to set aside a sheriff’s sale in foreclosure proceedings because of gross inadequacy of the price realized. Their petition was filed more than two years after delivery of the sheriff’s deed, during which time plaintiff mortgagee, who became the purchaser of the property at the sale, had demolished the building on the premises and built a new structure thereon at a substantial cost. It is obvious that under *307 such circumstances defendants’ application for relief came much too late, and their rule was properly discharged by the court below: Knox v. Noggle, 328 Pa. 302.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
196 A. 20, 328 Pa. 306, 1938 Pa. LEXIS 415, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fidelity-philadelphia-trust-co-v-north-philadelphia-trust-co-pa-1937.