Fidelity-Phenix Fire Insurance Co. v. Berry

53 S.E.2d 126, 79 Ga. App. 179, 1949 Ga. App. LEXIS 609
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 22, 1949·No. 32447.·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Felton, J.

Where in an action on a fire-insurance policy the declaration alleges compliance with the terms of the policy as to the filing of a claim, which was prerequisite to the filing of the action on the policy, it was error for the court to direct a verdict for the plaintiff when there was no evidence as to such compliance with the terms of the policy. This is true even if there was evidence as to a waiver of such compliance, in the absence of an amendment to the petition setting forth such waiver. Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Gate City Nat. Bank, 97 Ga. 634 (4) (25 S. E. 392); New Zealand Fire Ins. Co. v. Brewer, 29 Ga. App. 773 (116 S. E. 922), and cases cited.

The court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Button, C. J., and Parker, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fidelity-Phenix Fire Insurance Co. v. Berry, 53 S.E.2d 126, 79 Ga. App. 179, 1949 Ga. App. LEXIS 609 (Ga. Ct. App. 1949).

53 S.E.2d 126 (Fidelity-Phenix Fire Insurance Co. v. Berry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. Hickman
111 S.E.2d 380 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1959)
Neese v. Milwaukee Mechanics' Insurance
66 S.E.2d 172 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1951)