Fidelity National Title Insurance Co. v. Turner

Missouri Court of Appeals

Fidelity National Title Insurance Co. v. Turner

179 S.W.3d 313, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1736, 2005 WL 3159712

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 29, 2005·No. ED 85947·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

William Turner (Appellant) appeals from the summary judgments entered by the trial court in favor of Fidelity National Title Insurance Company and NETCO, Inc. (collectively Respondents). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that there are no issues of material fact and Respondents were entitled to judgment as a mat *314 ter of law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided ,a memorandum setting forth the reasons for-our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgments pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

William Turner (Appellant) appeals from the summary judgments entered by the trial court in favor of Fidelity National Title Insurance Company and NETCO, Inc. (collectively Respondents). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that there are no issues of material fact and Respondents were entitled to judgment as a mat *314 ter of law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided ,a memorandum setting forth the reasons for-our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgments pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Fidelity National Title Insurance Co. v. Turner, 179 S.W.3d 313, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1736, 2005 WL 3159712 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

179 S.W.3d 313 (Fidelity National Title Insurance Co. v. Turner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.