Fidelity & Guaranty Fire Corp. v. Marine Midland Trust Co.
This text of 162 Misc. 12 (Fidelity & Guaranty Fire Corp. v. Marine Midland Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The drawee, First National Bank, having paid out the money upon a forged indorsement, had no right to charge plaintiff (drawer) with such payment and upon the facts here shown plaintiff can recover the amount thereof from said bank. Plaintiff, therefore, has suffered no damage for which recovery may be had against these defendants. (General Fire Assurance Co. v. State Bank, 177 App. Div. 745; Maryland Casualty Co. v. Chase Nat. Bank, 153 Misc. 538.) Furthermore, after utterance of the checks plaintiff did not have the legal title to, or a general or special property in, or right to, the possession thereof. (Mayer v. Kilpatrick, 7 Misc. 689.)
[13]*13Judgment in favor of plaintiff against defendant Marine Midland Trust Company of New York (collecting bank) reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and judgment directed for said defendant. Judgment in favor of Marine Midland Trust Company of New York against defendant Blum reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and judgment directed for said defendant.
All concur. Present — Lydon, Hammer and Frankenthaler, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
162 Misc. 12, 293 N.Y.S. 519, 1937 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1514, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fidelity-guaranty-fire-corp-v-marine-midland-trust-co-nyappterm-1937.