Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Anderson

28 S.E. 382, 102 Ga. 551, 1897 Ga. LEXIS 550
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMarch 22, 1897
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 28 S.E. 382 (Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Anderson, 28 S.E. 382, 102 Ga. 551, 1897 Ga. LEXIS 550 (Ga. 1897).

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

Where a cause involving both questions of law and fact is submitted, without the intervention of a jury, to the judge of a superior court, and the trial of the issue therein made results in a finding in favor of the plaintiff, and upon writ of error to such judgment the only assignment of error is a general one not specifying how ®r wherein the trial judge erred in his judgment, whether as to matter of law or as to matter of fact, such assignment of error is too general to be considered in this court, and upon motion the writ of error will be dismissed. Mayor of Brunswick v. Moore, and Hall v. Huff, 74 Ga. 409; Mutual Building & Loan Ass’n v. Glessner, 99 Ga. 747.

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concurring. Hall & Hardeman, Dessau, Bartlett & Ellis, Bacon, Miller & Brunson and Hole Smith & H. 0. Peeples, for plaintiffs in error. Anderson & Anderson, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vick v. Farmers & Merchants Bank of Coolidge
70 S.E.2d 764 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1952)
Federal Land Bank v. Bank of Lenox
16 S.E.2d 9 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1941)
Petty v. Bryant
2 S.E.2d 910 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)
Carmichael v. Mobley
178 S.E. 418 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)
Greenwood v. Ledford
166 S.E. 839 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1932)
Anderson v. Ashford & Co.
160 S.E. 804 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1931)
Peck v. Harris
141 S.E. 433 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)
Haley v. Commercial National Bank
94 S.E. 1013 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1918)
Horkan v. City of Moultrie
89 S.E. 681 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1916)
Kennedy v. Kennedy
87 S.E. 157 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)
Willingham v. Cedartown Supply Co.
75 S.E. 823 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1912)
Patterson v. Beck
66 S.E. 911 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1910)
Wade v. Watson
66 S.E. 922 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1909)
Eastmore v. Bunkley
39 S.E. 105 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)
Collins v. Carr
36 S.E. 959 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1900)
Kimball v. Williams & McCurdy
33 S.E. 994 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1899)
Peavy v. Atkinson Bros.
33 S.E. 956 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 S.E. 382, 102 Ga. 551, 1897 Ga. LEXIS 550, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fidelity-deposit-co-v-anderson-ga-1897.