Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Kwiatkowski

227 A.D. 687

This text of 227 A.D. 687 (Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Kwiatkowski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Kwiatkowski, 227 A.D. 687 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).

Opinion

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, on the authority of Buell v. Van Camp (119 N. Y. 160). The failure of the defendant to deny in his affidavit the fact of his confession, taken in connection with the other evidence in the case, is sufficient, we think, within the above authority. All concur. Present — Crouch, Taylor, Edgcomb, Thompson and Crosby, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Buell v. . Van Camp
23 N.E. 538 (New York Court of Appeals, 1890)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
227 A.D. 687, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fidelity-deposit-co-of-maryland-v-kwiatkowski-nyappdiv-1929.