Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Kwiatkowski

227 A.D. 687

Opinion

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, on the authority of Buell v. Van Camp (119 N. Y. 160). The failure of the defendant to deny in his affidavit the fact of his confession, taken in connection with the other evidence in the case, is sufficient, we think, within the above authority. All concur. Present — Crouch, Taylor, Edgcomb, Thompson and Crosby, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Kwiatkowski, 227 A.D. 687 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).

227 A.D. 687 (Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Kwiatkowski) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Buell v. . Van Camp
23 N.E. 538 (New York Court of Appeals, 1890)