Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Hollenbeck & Sather/South, Inc.
192 So. 3d 1282, 2016 WL 3223988, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 9050
Opinion
Upon consideration of appellant’s response to the Court’s order of April 14, 2016, the Court has determined the appeal [1283] is premature. See Hickox v. Taylor, 933 So.2d 675 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006) (concluding that order granting motion for summary-judgment but failing to enter judgment is not a final, appealable order). Accordingly the appeal is DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Hollenbeck & Sather/South, Inc., 192 So. 3d 1282, 2016 WL 3223988, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 9050 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).
192 So. 3d 1282 (Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Hollenbeck & Sather/South, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hickox v. Taylor
933 So. 2d 675 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)