Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Goldman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Goldman

307 A.D.2d 238, 763 N.Y.S.2d 270, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8529

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 31, 2003

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 307 A.D.2d 238 (Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Goldman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Goldman, 307 A.D.2d 238, 763 N.Y.S.2d 270, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8529 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Appellate Term of the Supreme Court, First Department (Stanley Parnéss, P.J., and Phyllis Gangel-Jacob, J., in per curiam opinion; William McCooe, J., dissenting), entered February 8, 2002, which, inter alia, modified an order of the Civil Court, New York County (Rolando Acosta, J.), entered on or about November 14, 2000, granting plaintiffs motion for summary judgment and awarding plaintiff $23,553.57 plus interest on its claim for breach of an indemnity agreement, to the extent of granting plaintiff partial summary judgment on the issue of liability and remanding the matter for a hearing on the issue of damages, unanimously modified, on the law, to reinstate the aforesaid order of the Civil Court and, except as thus modified, affirmed for the reasons stated by McCooe, J., in his dissenting memorandum (190 Mise 2d 748, 751 [2002]), without costs or disbursements. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly. Concur — Tom, J.P., Sullivan, Rosenberger and Gonzalez, JJ. [See 190 Misc 2d 748.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Appellate Term of the Supreme Court, First Department (Stanley Parnéss, P.J., and Phyllis Gangel-Jacob, J., in per curiam opinion; William McCooe, J., dissenting), entered February 8, 2002, which, inter alia, modified an order of the Civil Court, New York County (Rolando Acosta, J.), entered on or about November 14, 2000, granting plaintiffs motion for summary judgment and awarding plaintiff $23,553.57 plus interest on its claim for breach of an indemnity agreement, to the extent of granting plaintiff partial summary judgment on the issue of liability and remanding the matter for a hearing on the issue of damages, unanimously modified, on the law, to reinstate the aforesaid order of the Civil Court and, except as thus modified, affirmed for the reasons stated by McCooe, J., in his dissenting memorandum (190 Mise 2d 748, 751 [2002]), without costs or disbursements. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly. Concur — Tom, J.P., Sullivan, Rosenberger and Gonzalez, JJ. [See 190 Misc 2d 748.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

307 A.D.2d 238, 763 N.Y.S.2d 270, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8529, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fidelity-deposit-co-of-maryland-v-goldman-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack