Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. F. J. Mumm Contracting Co.
This text of 241 A.D. 651 (Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. F. J. Mumm Contracting Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellants to abide the event. Memorandum. Even if it be assumed that in the action entitled Vorce v. Town of Tonawanda, this defendant F. J. Mumm Contracting Company was sufficiently vouched into the action so as to be bound by the judgment — neither in the judgment roll in that action nor in the testimony presented upon the instant trial does it sufficiently appear that negligence of the Mumm Company was a contributing cause of the death of Kenneth Vorce. The burden of proof as to this was upon [652]*652plaintiff. (Parisi v. Hubbard, 226 App. Div. 280, 282.) AH concur. Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
241 A.D. 651, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fidelity-deposit-co-of-maryland-v-f-j-mumm-contracting-co-nyappdiv-1934.