Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Aultman

Supreme Court of Florida

Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Aultman

61 Fla. 198

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedJanuary 15, 1911

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 61 Fla. 198 (Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Aultman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Aultman, 61 Fla. 198 (Fla. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

[199]*199On Rehearing.

Per Curiam.

Tlie court did not overlook any oí the contentions of the plaintiff in error. A single motion to vacate a judgment by default and to allow the filing of pleas tendered with the motion was denied by the trial court; and as no showing was made for vacating the default judgment the denial of the motion was proper, especially where the pleas are defective. See Garlington v. Priest, 13 Fla., 559; Benedict v. W. T. Hadlow, 52 Fla., 188, 42 South. Rep., 239, Hocker v. Forrester, 53 Fla. 392, 43 South. Rep., 241.

A rehearing is denied.

Whitfield, C. J., and Shackleford and Cockrell, J. J. concur; Taylor, Hocker and Parkhill, J. J., concur in the opinion. .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[199]*199On Rehearing.

Per Curiam.

Tlie court did not overlook any oí the contentions of the plaintiff in error. A single motion to vacate a judgment by default and to allow the filing of pleas tendered with the motion was denied by the trial court; and as no showing was made for vacating the default judgment the denial of the motion was proper, especially where the pleas are defective. See Garlington v. Priest, 13 Fla., 559; Benedict v. W. T. Hadlow, 52 Fla., 188, 42 South. Rep., 239, Hocker v. Forrester, 53 Fla. 392, 43 South. Rep., 241.

A rehearing is denied.

Whitfield, C. J., and Shackleford and Cockrell, J. J. concur; Taylor, Hocker and Parkhill, J. J., concur in the opinion. .

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 Fla. 198, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fidelity-deposit-co-of-maryland-v-aultman-fla-1911.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack