Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Young Shoe Parlor

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Young Shoe Parlor

104 S.E. 432, 25 Ga. App. 664, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 139

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedOctober 1, 1920

Docket10293

StatusPublished

This text of 104 S.E. 432 (Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Young Shoe Parlor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Young Shoe Parlor, 104 S.E. 432, 25 Ga. App. 664, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 139 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

Under the rulings made by the Supreme Court on September 15, 1920, in answer to certain questions in this case certified by this court (150 Ga. 402, 104 S. E. 429), neither count of the plaintiff’s petition set out a cause of action, and the trial court erred in overruling the general demurrers thereto.

Judgment reversed.

Bloodworth, J., concurs. Luke, J., absent on account of illness.

2. Whether an estoppel to deny liability was shown by facts alleged in the second count of the plaintiff’s petition was a question also certified, and also answer.ed in the negative. The facts are set out in 150 Ga., supra.

Rosser, Slaton, Phillips & Hopkins, for plaintiff in error. Little, Powell, Smith & Goldstein, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI