Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Picone

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Picone

202 A.D. 812

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1922

DocketAppeal No. 2

StatusPublished

This text of 202 A.D. 812 (Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Picone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Picone, 202 A.D. 812 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

We think the answer raises an issue as to the subject-matter of the indemnity agreement. It may be that on the trial the plaintiff can show that the indemnitors intended the agreement to apply to the bond in the County Court. Order denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment* affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Rich, Kelly, Jaycox and Young, JJ., concur; Blackmar, P. J., concurs in the result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

We think the answer raises an issue as to the subject-matter of the indemnity agreement. It may be that on the trial the plaintiff can show that the indemnitors intended the agreement to apply to the bond in the County Court. Order denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment* affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Rich, Kelly, Jaycox and Young, JJ., concur; Blackmar, P. J., concurs in the result.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

202 A.D. 812, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fidelity-casualty-co-v-picone-nyappdiv-1922.