Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Picone

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Picone

202 A.D. 812

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1922·No. Appeal No. 2·Published

Opinion

We think the answer raises an issue as to the subject-matter of the indemnity agreement. It may be that on the trial the plaintiff can show that the indemnitors intended the agreement to apply to the bond in the County Court. Order denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment* affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Rich, Kelly, Jaycox and Young, JJ., concur; Blackmar, P. J., concurs in the result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

We think the answer raises an issue as to the subject-matter of the indemnity agreement. It may be that on the trial the plaintiff can show that the indemnitors intended the agreement to apply to the bond in the County Court. Order denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment* affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Rich, Kelly, Jaycox and Young, JJ., concur; Blackmar, P. J., concurs in the result.

Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Picone, 202 A.D. 812 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

202 A.D. 812 (Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Picone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.