Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Geiger

Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Geiger

83 S.E. 92, 142 Ga. 438, 1914 Ga. LEXIS 737
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 21, 1914
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 83 S.E. 92 (Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Geiger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Geiger, 83 S.E. 92, 142 Ga. 438, 1914 Ga. LEXIS 737 (Ga. 1914).

Opinion

Hill, J.

Several of the grounds of the motion for a new trial are too vague and indefinite to be considered by the court. The rule is that each ground of the motion must be complete in itself. Even if any of the other rulings and charge of the court complained of were erroneous, there is no error of sufficient materiality to require a new trial. The verdict is supported by the evidence.

Judgment Affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Martin v. Smith
87 S.E.2d 406 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1955)
Dye v. Dotson
39 S.E.2d 8 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1946)
Dowdell v. State
38 S.E.2d 780 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1946)
Jones v. Jones
26 S.E.2d 602 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1943)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
83 S.E. 92, 142 Ga. 438, 1914 Ga. LEXIS 737, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fidelity-casualty-co-v-geiger-ga-1914.