Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Geiger
83 S.E. 92, 142 Ga. 438, 1914 Ga. LEXIS 737
Opinion
Several of the grounds of the motion for a new trial are too vague and indefinite to be considered by the court. The rule is that each ground of the motion must be complete in itself. Even if any of the other rulings and charge of the court complained of were erroneous, there is no error of sufficient materiality to require a new trial. The verdict is supported by the evidence.
Judgment Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Geiger, 83 S.E. 92, 142 Ga. 438, 1914 Ga. LEXIS 737 (Ga. 1914).
83 S.E. 92 (Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Geiger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Martin v. Smith
87 S.E.2d 406 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1955)
Dye v. Dotson
39 S.E.2d 8 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1946)
Dowdell v. State
38 S.E.2d 780 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1946)
Jones v. Jones
26 S.E.2d 602 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1943)