Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. D. N. Morrison Construction Co.

Supreme Court

Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. D. N. Morrison Construction Co.

293 U.S. 534, 55 S. Ct. 348

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 7, 1935·No. No. 560·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion of the appellee to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Parsons v. Federal Realty Corp., 105 Fla. 105; 143 So. 912; Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Hilton-Green, 241 U. S. 613, 623; American Fire Ins. Co. v. King Lumber Co., 250 U. S. 2, 10-11, 13-14; Orient Ins. Co. v. Daggs, 172 U. S. 557, 565-566; National Ins. Co. v. Wanberg, 260 U. S. 71, 73 et seq.; Stipcich v. Insurance Co., 277 U. S. 311, 320; Merchants Liability Co. v. Smart, 267 U. S. 126, 129; Hancock Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Warren, 181 U. S. 73, 76-77; O’Gorman & Young v. Hartford Ins. Co., 282 U. S. 251, 257.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The motion of the appellee to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Parsons v. Federal Realty Corp., 105 Fla. 105; 143 So. 912; Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Hilton-Green, 241 U. S. 613, 623; American Fire Ins. Co. v. King Lumber Co., 250 U. S. 2, 10-11, 13-14; Orient Ins. Co. v. Daggs, 172 U. S. 557, 565-566; National Ins. Co. v. Wanberg, 260 U. S. 71, 73 et seq.; Stipcich v. Insurance Co., 277 U. S. 311, 320; Merchants Liability Co. v. Smart, 267 U. S. 126, 129; Hancock Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Warren, 181 U. S. 73, 76-77; O’Gorman & Young v. Hartford Ins. Co., 282 U. S. 251, 257.

Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. D. N. Morrison Construction Co., 293 U.S. 534, 55 S. Ct. 348 (1935).

Pincite

293 U.S. 534 (Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. D. N. Morrison Construction Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related