Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Coley & Peterson, Inc.

293 U.S. 534, 55 S. Ct. 348
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 7, 1935
DocketNo. 561
StatusPublished

This text of 293 U.S. 534 (Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Coley & Peterson, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Coley & Peterson, Inc., 293 U.S. 534, 55 S. Ct. 348 (1935).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion of the appellee to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Parsons v. Federal Realty Corp., 105 Fla. 105; 143 So. 912; Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Hilton-Green, 241 U. S. 613, 623; American Fire Ins. Co. v. King Lumber Co., 250 U. S. 2, 10-11, 13-14; Orient Ins. Co. v. Daggs, 172 U. S. 557, 565-566; National Ins. Co. v. Wanberg, 260 U. S. 71, 73 et seq.; Stipcich v. Insurance Co., 277 U. S. 311, 320; Merchants Liability Co. v. Smart, 267 U. S. 126, 129; Hancock Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Warren, 181 U. S. 73, 76-77; O’Gorman & Young v. Hartford Ins. Co., 282 U. S. 251, 257.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Orient Insurance v. Daggs
172 U.S. 557 (Supreme Court, 1899)
Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. Warren
181 U.S. 73 (Supreme Court, 1901)
National Union Fire Insurance v. Wanberg
260 U.S. 71 (Supreme Court, 1922)
Stipcich v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
277 U.S. 311 (Supreme Court, 1928)
O'Gorman & Young, Inc. v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.
282 U.S. 251 (Supreme Court, 1931)
Parsons v. Federal Realty Corp.
143 So. 912 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
293 U.S. 534, 55 S. Ct. 348, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fidelity-casualty-co-v-coley-peterson-inc-scotus-1935.