Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Coley & Peterson, Inc.

293 U.S. 534, 55 S. Ct. 348
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 7, 1935·No. No. 561·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion of the appellee to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Parsons v. Federal Realty Corp., 105 Fla. 105; 143 So. 912; Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Hilton-Green, 241 U. S. 613, 623; American Fire Ins. Co. v. King Lumber Co., 250 U. S. 2, 10-11, 13-14; Orient Ins. Co. v. Daggs, 172 U. S. 557, 565-566; National Ins. Co. v. Wanberg, 260 U. S. 71, 73 et seq.; Stipcich v. Insurance Co., 277 U. S. 311, 320; Merchants Liability Co. v. Smart, 267 U. S. 126, 129; Hancock Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Warren, 181 U. S. 73, 76-77; O’Gorman & Young v. Hartford Ins. Co., 282 U. S. 251, 257.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Coley & Peterson, Inc., 293 U.S. 534, 55 S. Ct. 348 (1935).

293 U.S. 534 (Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Coley & Peterson, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Orient Insurance v. Daggs
172 U.S. 557 (Supreme Court, 1899)
Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. Warren
181 U.S. 73 (Supreme Court, 1901)
National Union Fire Insurance v. Wanberg
260 U.S. 71 (Supreme Court, 1922)
Stipcich v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
277 U.S. 311 (Supreme Court, 1928)
O'Gorman & Young, Inc. v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.
282 U.S. 251 (Supreme Court, 1931)
Parsons v. Federal Realty Corp.
143 So. 912 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1931)