Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Black

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Black

157 N.Y.S. 838

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedMarch 13, 1916

StatusPublished

This text of 157 N.Y.S. 838 (Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Black) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Black, 157 N.Y.S. 838 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

WEEKS, J.

Issue in this case was joined by the defendant in person, and the case set down for trial for November 26, 1915, and again adjourned at tire request of defendant until December 3, 1915. The action was brought to recover the sum of $7.50, claimed by plaintiff to be the amount of an earned premium upon an insurance policy issued by it to the defendant. On the adjourned day the attorney who was to try the case for the plaintiff was actually engaged in the Supreme Court in the trial of a case. An affidavit showing such engagement was offered to the trial justice by the clerk of the attorney, but the justice ignored it and asked an attorney present in the courtroom upon another case to appear for and represent the defendant. The attorney thus assigned, having been advised of the situation, moved to dismiss the complaint, which motion was granted, with $5 costs. Upon the hearing to open the default the same facts appeared as to tire actual engagement of plaintiff’s attorney, and "the court opened the default, but imposed the paympnt of a further sum of $5 as a condition therefor. This court has held that the actual engagement of counsel in the trial of another case furnishes a complete excuse for the adjournment of a case, and that in such cases the default should be opened without terms. Mann v. Hefter, 128 N. Y. Supp. 663; Silverman v. Mark, 148 N. Y. Supp. 259.

Order modified, by striking therefrom the imposition of costs, and, as modified, affirmed, with $10 costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WEEKS, J.

Issue in this case was joined by the defendant in person, and the case set down for trial for November 26, 1915, and again adjourned at tire request of defendant until December 3, 1915. The action was brought to recover the sum of $7.50, claimed by plaintiff to be the amount of an earned premium upon an insurance policy issued by it to the defendant. On the adjourned day the attorney who was to try the case for the plaintiff was actually engaged in the Supreme Court in the trial of a case. An affidavit showing such engagement was offered to the trial justice by the clerk of the attorney, but the justice ignored it and asked an attorney present in the courtroom upon another case to appear for and represent the defendant. The attorney thus assigned, having been advised of the situation, moved to dismiss the complaint, which motion was granted, with $5 costs. Upon the hearing to open the default the same facts appeared as to tire actual engagement of plaintiff’s attorney, and "the court opened the default, but imposed the paympnt of a further sum of $5 as a condition therefor. This court has held that the actual engagement of counsel in the trial of another case furnishes a complete excuse for the adjournment of a case, and that in such cases the default should be opened without terms. Mann v. Hefter, 128 N. Y. Supp. 663; Silverman v. Mark, 148 N. Y. Supp. 259.

Order modified, by striking therefrom the imposition of costs, and, as modified, affirmed, with $10 costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

157 N.Y.S. 838, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fidelity-casualty-co-v-black-nyappterm-1916.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack