Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Yancey

Supreme Court of Georgia

Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Yancey

102 S.E.2d 497, 213 Ga. 903, 1958 Ga. LEXIS 317

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedMarch 7, 1958

Docket19936

StatusPublished

This text of 102 S.E.2d 497 (Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Yancey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Yancey, 102 S.E.2d 497, 213 Ga. 903, 1958 Ga. LEXIS 317 (Ga. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

Hawkins, Justice.

Upon careful examination of the record and mature consideration of the question presented, we have reached the conclusion that the writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals (96 Ga. App. 476, 100 S. E. 2d 653) was improvidently granted, and it is accordingly

Dismissed.

All the Justices concur, except Duckworth, C.J., and Candler, J., who dissent. Frank H. Edwards, for party at interest not party to record. Daniel Duke, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hawkins, Justice.

Upon careful examination of the record and mature consideration of the question presented, we have reached the conclusion that the writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals (96 Ga. App. 476, 100 S. E. 2d 653) was improvidently granted, and it is accordingly

Dismissed.

All the Justices concur, except Duckworth, C.J., and Candler, J., who dissent. Frank H. Edwards, for party at interest not party to record. Daniel Duke, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

102 S.E.2d 497, 213 Ga. 903, 1958 Ga. LEXIS 317, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fidelity-casualty-co-of-new-york-v-yancey-ga-1958.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack