Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Yancey

Supreme Court of Georgia

Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Yancey

102 S.E.2d 497, 213 Ga. 903, 1958 Ga. LEXIS 317

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided March 7, 1958·No. 19936·Published

Opinion

Hawkins, Justice.

Upon careful examination of the record and mature consideration of the question presented, we have reached the conclusion that the writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals (96 Ga. App. 476, 100 S. E. 2d 653) was improvidently granted, and it is accordingly

Dismissed.

All the Justices concur, except Duckworth, C.J., and Candler, J., who dissent. Frank H. Edwards, for party at interest not party to record. Daniel Duke, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hawkins, Justice.

Upon careful examination of the record and mature consideration of the question presented, we have reached the conclusion that the writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals (96 Ga. App. 476, 100 S. E. 2d 653) was improvidently granted, and it is accordingly

Dismissed.

All the Justices concur, except Duckworth, C.J., and Candler, J., who dissent. Frank H. Edwards, for party at interest not party to record. Daniel Duke, contra.

Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Yancey, 102 S.E.2d 497, 213 Ga. 903, 1958 Ga. LEXIS 317 (Ga. 1958).

Pincite

102 S.E.2d 497 (Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Yancey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related