Fidelity Building & Loan Ass'n v. Elizabeth Avenue Holding Co.

180 A. 881, 119 N.J. Eq. 11, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 581
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 9, 1935·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Our examination of the proofs leads us to the conclusion that the facts developed bring the case within the principal established by this court in cases of similar character, notably, Russ Distributing Corp. v. Lichtman, 111 N. J. Law 21; Domestic Electric Co. v. Mezzaluna, 109 N. J. Law 574, and Lumpkin v. Holland Furnace Co., 118 N. J. Eq. 813.

The decree is affirmed.

For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 13.

For reversal —None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fidelity Building & Loan Ass'n v. Elizabeth Avenue Holding Co., 180 A. 881, 119 N.J. Eq. 11, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 581 (N.J. 1935).

180 A. 881 (Fidelity Building & Loan Ass'n v. Elizabeth Avenue Holding Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brighton v. Borough of Rumson
50 A.2d 485 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1947)
Swift & Co. v. Von Volkum
34 A.2d 897 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1943)
Calicchio v. Jersey City Stock Yards Co.
14 A.2d 465 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1940)
Rubeo v. Arthur McMullen Co.
189 A. 662 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1937)