Fidelio v. Dermott

8 F. Cas. 1175, 1 Cranch 405
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
DecidedJune 15, 1807
DocketCase No. 4,754
StatusPublished

This text of 8 F. Cas. 1175 (Fidelio v. Dermott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fidelio v. Dermott, 8 F. Cas. 1175, 1 Cranch 405 (circtddc 1807).

Opinion

But

THE COURT

said clearly it does not, because, at the time of making the codicil, there were three years unexpired of the time of his service; which might be sold, and so make the codicil consistent with the will, and give operation to both.

Verdict for the petitioner.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 F. Cas. 1175, 1 Cranch 405, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fidelio-v-dermott-circtddc-1807.